Review



gli1  (Novus Biologicals)


Bioz Verified Symbol Novus Biologicals is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Novus Biologicals manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 94

    Structured Review

    Novus Biologicals gli1
    ( A ) Limiting dilution analysis of stem cell–mediated bone formation with renal capsule transplantation. Representative images of whole-mount von Kossa staining detecting ectopic bone formation in the mouse recipients transplanted by the indicated number of suture cells into the renal capsule. Arrowheads indicate the ectopic bones. ( B ) Representative images showing the analysis of Axin2-expressing cells using the Axin2 mGFP allele in the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( C ) Representative images examining the BMPR1A + and <t>GLI1</t> + cell population within the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( D ) Graphs indicate the quantitation of the average percentage of BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cells in 3 independent experiments ( P < 0.005 or 0.05, n = 3, mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test). SAG, sagittal; COR, coronal; AF, anterior frontal. Scale bars: 1 mm ( A ) and 50 μm ( B and C ).
    Gli1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 22 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI-1+Antibody+-+BSA+Free/pmc13041684-162-33-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 22 article reviews
    gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Stem cell–associated osteogenic deficiency causes craniofacial deformities with progeroid accumulation of prelamin A"

    Article Title: Stem cell–associated osteogenic deficiency causes craniofacial deformities with progeroid accumulation of prelamin A

    Journal: JCI Insight

    doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.196932

    ( A ) Limiting dilution analysis of stem cell–mediated bone formation with renal capsule transplantation. Representative images of whole-mount von Kossa staining detecting ectopic bone formation in the mouse recipients transplanted by the indicated number of suture cells into the renal capsule. Arrowheads indicate the ectopic bones. ( B ) Representative images showing the analysis of Axin2-expressing cells using the Axin2 mGFP allele in the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( C ) Representative images examining the BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cell population within the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( D ) Graphs indicate the quantitation of the average percentage of BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cells in 3 independent experiments ( P < 0.005 or 0.05, n = 3, mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test). SAG, sagittal; COR, coronal; AF, anterior frontal. Scale bars: 1 mm ( A ) and 50 μm ( B and C ).
    Figure Legend Snippet: ( A ) Limiting dilution analysis of stem cell–mediated bone formation with renal capsule transplantation. Representative images of whole-mount von Kossa staining detecting ectopic bone formation in the mouse recipients transplanted by the indicated number of suture cells into the renal capsule. Arrowheads indicate the ectopic bones. ( B ) Representative images showing the analysis of Axin2-expressing cells using the Axin2 mGFP allele in the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( C ) Representative images examining the BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cell population within the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( D ) Graphs indicate the quantitation of the average percentage of BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cells in 3 independent experiments ( P < 0.005 or 0.05, n = 3, mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test). SAG, sagittal; COR, coronal; AF, anterior frontal. Scale bars: 1 mm ( A ) and 50 μm ( B and C ).

    Techniques Used: Transplantation Assay, Staining, Expressing, Quantitation Assay

    Related Articles

    other:

    Article Title: Small molecule Hedgehog pathway antagonists.
    Article Snippet: Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics, which may alter content.. The journal’s standard Terms & Conditions and the ethical guidelines, outlined in our author and reviewer resource centre, still apply.. In no event shall the Royal Society of Chemistry be held responsible for any errors or omissions in this Accepted Manuscript or any consequences arising from the use of any information it contains.

    Article Title: Non-canonical Hedgehog signaling mediates profibrotic hematopoiesis-stroma crosstalk in myeloproliferative neoplasms
    Article Snippet: Retroviral transduction was performed on retroNectin (Takara Bio)-coated cell culture dishes pre coated with unconcentrated virus with the addition of concentrated retroviral supernatant in the presence of 4 μg/ml polybrene at 37°C for at least 24 h. Lentivirus transductions were performed with concentrated lentiviral supernatant in the presence of 4 μg/ml polybrene at 37°C for at least 24 h.

    Article Title: GANT61 Reduces Hedgehog Molecule (GLI1) Expression and Promotes Apoptosis in Metastatic Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells
    Article Snippet: The following antibodies were used in the Western blot assay: mouse polyclonal against Sonic Hedgehog (1:500, Clone 5 H4, Cat. number NBP2-22126, Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA), rabbit polyclonal against Gli1 (1:500, Novus Biologicals, Cat. number NB600-600), rabbit polyclonal against Patched 1 (1:500, Novus Biologicals, Cat.number NB200-118), and rabbit polyclonal against Smoothened (1:1000, Cat. number AB72130, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA).

    Article Title: STAT3 induces the expression of GLI1 in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells
    Article Snippet: Cells were then stained with CD19 (BD Biosciences, San Jose CA), CD5 (BD Biosciences), GLI1 (Novus Biologicals), pSer-STAT3 (BD Biosciences) or with their corresponding isotypic control and analyzed on a FacsCaliber flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

    Chromatin Immunoprecipitation:

    Article Title: CD47-MEDIATED HEDGEHOG/SMO/GLI1 SIGNALING PROMOTES MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL IMMUNOMODULATION IN MOUSE LIVER INFLAMMATION
    Article Snippet: The ChIP analysis was carried out using ChIP Assay Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abcam). .. For sequential ChIP, sheared chromatin was first immunoprecipitated with NICD antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and then eluted with a second immunoprecipitation using Gli1 antibody (Novus Biologicals). ..

    Article Title: CD47-Mediated Hedgehog/SMO/GLI1 Signaling Promotes Mesenchymal Stem Cell Immunomodulation in Mouse Liver Inflammation.
    Article Snippet: The ChIP analysis was carried out using ChIP Assay Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abcam). .. For sequential ChIP, sheared chromatin was first immunoprecipitated with NICD antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and then eluted with a second immunoprecipitation using Gli1 antibody (Novus Biologicals). ..

    Immunoprecipitation:

    Article Title: CD47-MEDIATED HEDGEHOG/SMO/GLI1 SIGNALING PROMOTES MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL IMMUNOMODULATION IN MOUSE LIVER INFLAMMATION
    Article Snippet: The ChIP analysis was carried out using ChIP Assay Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abcam). .. For sequential ChIP, sheared chromatin was first immunoprecipitated with NICD antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and then eluted with a second immunoprecipitation using Gli1 antibody (Novus Biologicals). ..

    Article Title: CD47-Mediated Hedgehog/SMO/GLI1 Signaling Promotes Mesenchymal Stem Cell Immunomodulation in Mouse Liver Inflammation.
    Article Snippet: The ChIP analysis was carried out using ChIP Assay Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (Abcam). .. For sequential ChIP, sheared chromatin was first immunoprecipitated with NICD antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) and then eluted with a second immunoprecipitation using Gli1 antibody (Novus Biologicals). ..



    Similar Products

    94
    MedChemExpress sh gli1 plasmids
    Sh Gli1 Plasmids, supplied by MedChemExpress, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/Gli1+Antibody/pm42587002-41-41-48
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    sh gli1 plasmids - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech fluorescence labeled antibody against gli1
    Fluorescence Labeled Antibody Against Gli1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI1+Antibody/10__1097_slash_cm9__0000000000004041-65-19-23
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    fluorescence labeled antibody against gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech 1 ig
    1 Ig, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI1+Antibody/pm41863804-423-26-24
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    1 ig - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    93
    R&D Systems gli1
    Gli1, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/Human%2FMouse+GLI-1+Antibody/pm41857757-52-25-29
    Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    93/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti gli1
    Anti Gli1, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI-1+Antibody/pm41864338-72-30-33
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    86
    Cell Signaling Technology Inc antibodies against gli1
    ( a ) <t>Gli1</t> mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.
    Antibodies Against Gli1, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/pmc12978703-402-12-20
    Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies against gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    86/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech antibodies against gli1
    ( a ) <t>Gli1</t> mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.
    Antibodies Against Gli1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI1+Antibody/pmc12978703-402-12-40
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibodies against gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Proteintech gli1
    ( a ) <t>Gli1</t> mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.
    Gli1, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI1+Antibody/pm41782409-76-22-24
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    94
    Novus Biologicals gli1
    ( A ) Limiting dilution analysis of stem cell–mediated bone formation with renal capsule transplantation. Representative images of whole-mount von Kossa staining detecting ectopic bone formation in the mouse recipients transplanted by the indicated number of suture cells into the renal capsule. Arrowheads indicate the ectopic bones. ( B ) Representative images showing the analysis of Axin2-expressing cells using the Axin2 mGFP allele in the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( C ) Representative images examining the BMPR1A + and <t>GLI1</t> + cell population within the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( D ) Graphs indicate the quantitation of the average percentage of BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cells in 3 independent experiments ( P < 0.005 or 0.05, n = 3, mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test). SAG, sagittal; COR, coronal; AF, anterior frontal. Scale bars: 1 mm ( A ) and 50 μm ( B and C ).
    Gli1, supplied by Novus Biologicals, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/gli1+antibody/GLI-1+Antibody+-+BSA+Free/pmc13041684-162-33-36
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    gli1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
    94/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Mutagenesis

    ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 1 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 1 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay

    ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 2 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 2 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay

    ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 3 × 10 -6 , Y LD A: 2.46 × 10 -4 , F 6.65 f A: 1.08 × 10 -3 , I ECL 3 A: 1.12 × 10 -4 , treated WT vs treated mutant: F 6.65 f A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , I ECL 3 A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , Y LD A: 1.4 × 10 -5 , key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} Gli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) are plotted for mutants along the TMD-CRD pathway. ( c, d ) Example mutants Y LD A and F 6.65 f A show that cholesterol is unable to translocate through this pathway because of the loss of crucial hydrophobic contacts provided by Y207 and F484 and along the solvent-exposed pathway.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 3 × 10 -6 , Y LD A: 2.46 × 10 -4 , F 6.65 f A: 1.08 × 10 -3 , I ECL 3 A: 1.12 × 10 -4 , treated WT vs treated mutant: F 6.65 f A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , I ECL 3 A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , Y LD A: 1.4 × 10 -5 , key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} Gli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) are plotted for mutants along the TMD-CRD pathway. ( c, d ) Example mutants Y LD A and F 6.65 f A show that cholesterol is unable to translocate through this pathway because of the loss of crucial hydrophobic contacts provided by Y207 and F484 and along the solvent-exposed pathway.

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Mutagenesis, Solvent

    ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure the abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO −⁄− cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Common Pathway mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure the abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO −⁄− cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Common Pathway mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay

    ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 1.327 × 10 -3 , G 2.57 f V: 9.212 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 4.2 × 10 -5 , A 2.60 f M: 7.1 × 100 -5 , R 5.64 f A: 2.062 × 10 -3 , R 5.64 f Q: 1.192 × 10 -3 , F 6.36 f I: 2.163 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 1.948 × 10 -3 , treated WT vs treated mutant: G 2.57 f V: 9.1 × 10 -3 , I ECL2 A: 0.02734, A 2.60 f M: 0.7477, R 5.64 f A: 0.08858, R 5.64 f Q: 0.02766, F 6.36 f I: 1.923 × 10 -3 , L 5.62 f A: 2.306 × 10 key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) ΔGli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) plotted for the mutants in Pathway 1. ( c ) Example mutant A 2.60 f M shows that cholesterol is able to enter SMO through Pathway 1 even on a bulky mutation. ( d ) Same as ( b ) but for Pathway 2 ( e ) Example mutant L 5.62 f A shows that cholesterol can enter SMO through Pathway 2 due to lesser steric hindrance. All snapshots presented are frames taken from MD simulations.

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Mutagenesis

    ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 1 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 1 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay

    ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 2 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO -/- cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Pathway 2 mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 3—figure supplement 4—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay

    ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 3 × 10 -6 , Y LD A: 2.46 × 10 -4 , F 6.65 f A: 1.08 × 10 -3 , I ECL 3 A: 1.12 × 10 -4 , treated WT vs treated mutant: F 6.65 f A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , I ECL 3 A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , Y LD A: 1.4 × 10 -5 , key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} Gli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) are plotted for mutants along the TMD-CRD pathway. ( c, d ) Example mutants Y LD A and F 6.65 f A show that cholesterol is unable to translocate through this pathway because of the loss of crucial hydrophobic contacts provided by Y207 and F484 and along the solvent-exposed pathway.

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Gli1 mRNA fold changes show the responsiveness of SMO mutants to SHH. Untreated Gli1 levels indicate low SMO activity, while SHH-treated values correspond to the level of SMO activation induced by SHH ligand. A t-test with Welch’s correction was used to compute statistical significance. (p values: untreated vs treated: WT: 3 × 10 -6 , Y LD A: 2.46 × 10 -4 , F 6.65 f A: 1.08 × 10 -3 , I ECL 3 A: 1.12 × 10 -4 , treated WT vs treated mutant: F 6.65 f A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , I ECL 3 A: 1.6 × 10 -5 , Y LD A: 1.4 × 10 -5 , key: Not significant (ns) p > 0.05, *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, and ****p ≤ 0.0001, All experimental data represent biological replicates, N=4.) ( b ) Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} Gli1 mRNA fold change (SHH vs untreated) and Δ \begin{document}$\Delta$\end{document} PMF (difference of peak PMF, calculated as P M F W T \begin{document}$PMF_{WT}$\end{document} - P M F m u t a n t \begin{document}$PMF_{mutant}$\end{document} ) are plotted for mutants along the TMD-CRD pathway. ( c, d ) Example mutants Y LD A and F 6.65 f A show that cholesterol is unable to translocate through this pathway because of the loss of crucial hydrophobic contacts provided by Y207 and F484 and along the solvent-exposed pathway.

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Activation Assay, Mutagenesis, Solvent

    ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure the abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO −⁄− cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Common Pathway mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Journal: eLife

    Article Title: Multiple modes of cholesterol translocation in the human Smoothened receptor

    doi: 10.7554/eLife.108030

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( a ) Immunoblotting was used to measure the abundance of mSMO and GLI1 proteins in SMO −⁄− cells stably expressing either mSMO-WT or Common Pathway mutants after treatment with SHH. ( b ) Gli1 mRNA fold change plotted for SMO mutants, showing fold change when the mutants are untreated, treated with a low concentration of SHH, and treated with a saturating concentration of SHH. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 1. PDF file containing original western blots for , indicating the relevant bands and treatments. Figure 6—figure supplement 1—source data 2. Original files for western blot analysis displayed in .

    Article Snippet: Samples were then subjected to SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, followed by immunoblotting with antibodies against GLI1 [anti-GLI1 mouse monoclonal (clone L42B10); Cell Signaling Technology, catalog no. 2643, RRID: AB_2294746 ], SMO (rabbit polyclonal) , or GAPDH [anti-GAPDH mouse monoclonal (clone 1E6D9); Protein tech, catalog no. 60004–1-Ig, RRID: AB_2107436 ].

    Techniques: Western Blot, Stable Transfection, Expressing, Concentration Assay

    ( A ) Limiting dilution analysis of stem cell–mediated bone formation with renal capsule transplantation. Representative images of whole-mount von Kossa staining detecting ectopic bone formation in the mouse recipients transplanted by the indicated number of suture cells into the renal capsule. Arrowheads indicate the ectopic bones. ( B ) Representative images showing the analysis of Axin2-expressing cells using the Axin2 mGFP allele in the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( C ) Representative images examining the BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cell population within the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( D ) Graphs indicate the quantitation of the average percentage of BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cells in 3 independent experiments ( P < 0.005 or 0.05, n = 3, mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test). SAG, sagittal; COR, coronal; AF, anterior frontal. Scale bars: 1 mm ( A ) and 50 μm ( B and C ).

    Journal: JCI Insight

    Article Title: Stem cell–associated osteogenic deficiency causes craniofacial deformities with progeroid accumulation of prelamin A

    doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.196932

    Figure Lengend Snippet: ( A ) Limiting dilution analysis of stem cell–mediated bone formation with renal capsule transplantation. Representative images of whole-mount von Kossa staining detecting ectopic bone formation in the mouse recipients transplanted by the indicated number of suture cells into the renal capsule. Arrowheads indicate the ectopic bones. ( B ) Representative images showing the analysis of Axin2-expressing cells using the Axin2 mGFP allele in the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( C ) Representative images examining the BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cell population within the indicated 1-month-old (1M) suture. ( D ) Graphs indicate the quantitation of the average percentage of BMPR1A + and GLI1 + cells in 3 independent experiments ( P < 0.005 or 0.05, n = 3, mean ± SEM, 2-tailed Student’s t test). SAG, sagittal; COR, coronal; AF, anterior frontal. Scale bars: 1 mm ( A ) and 50 μm ( B and C ).

    Article Snippet: Mouse monoclonal antibodies against Bmpr1a (NBP2-37421, 1:75, Novus Biologicals), fascin1 (SC-21743, 1:100, Santa Cruz), and Alexa Fluor 568 phalloidin (A12380, 1:400, Invitrogen); rabbit polyclonal antibodies Osx (ab22552, 1:800, Abcam), OCN (23418-1-AP, 1:50, Proteintech), Gli1 (NBP1-78259, 1:100, Novus Biologicals), Myl2 (3671, 1:100, Cell Signaling Technology), and GM130 (2296, 1:200, Cell Signaling Technology); rabbit monoclonal antibodies lamin A/C (MA5-35284, 1:200, Invitrogen) and SUN2(EPR6557, 1:100, Abcam); anti-rabbit secondary antibody (BA-1000, 1:200, Vector laboratories); and anti-mouse IgG secondary antibodies (PK-2200, 1:250, Vector laboratories), were used in the immunostaining studies.

    Techniques: Transplantation Assay, Staining, Expressing, Quantitation Assay